We’ve all done it. Googled a symptom or ailment in the
hopes of diagnosing and treating ourselves (or a child) in order to avoid an often
timely, and costly trip to the doctor’s office.
Well, new research suggests that may not be such a great
idea.
A recent study published in the JAMA
Internal Medicine pitted actual physicians against online medical
apps, or symptom-checker programs, in clinically diagnosing patients.
Nearly 235 doctors were given 45 clinical vignettes on
patients that they then had to diagnose just using the information provided, no
medical exams were performed. The online medical resources, or mobile apps,
consulted were those offered by WebMD
and the Mayo Clinic
in the United States, and the Isabel
Symptom Checker in the United Kingdom.
Here’s what they found:
Human doctors got the
diagnosis right 72% of the time, compared to 34% for the online medical
experts.
When asked to rank possible
diagnoses, physicians ranked the correct diagnosis first more often than the
online tools.
Doctors were correct more times
regarding the diagnoses of “serious conditions,” while the computer methods were
better at identifying “less serious conditions.”
Overall, it was clear that
diagnosis by an actual healthcare provider is a much safer bet than relying solely
on an online resource. However, it was agreed that online resources can be
extremely helpful to physicians in verifying potential diagnoses with rapidly
changing symptoms or in high-stress settings, such as an emergency room.
(Adapted from Reuters-Health)
Keep up with Texas
Orthopedics news by following us on Facebook
and Twitter (@TexasOrthopedic).
No comments:
Post a Comment